Kota Kemuning Church of Christ

Mark 11:30 — “The Baptism Of John”

“There was a man sent from God, whose name  was John” (John 1:6). That statement does not refer  to John the apostle, but rather John the Baptizer, a  man who played a key role in God’s plan of  redemption.

One part of John’s activities was something that  the Bible calls “the baptism of John.” We read those  exact words in Matthew 21:25, Mark 11:30, Luke  7:29, Luke 20:4, Acts 1:22, and Acts 18:25. “The  baptism of John” would be the same thing as  “John’s baptism,” a term found in Acts 19:3.

John’s baptism – It was not part of the Law of  Moses. The first time we read about this baptism is  in Matthew chapter three, where we learn that  people (that is, Jews) from Jerusalem, all Judea, and  the region around the Jordan went to John to be  baptized in the Jordan River (Matthew 3:5,6). It is  interesting that when a new apostle was going to be  chosen to replace Judas Iscariot, part of the criteria  was that he must be someone who had been  involved in the Lord’s activities “from the baptism  of John” (Acts 1:22).

John’s baptism – There was divine authority  behind it. When Jesus was asked about who granted  Him the authority to do what He was doing in the  temple area, He responded by asking a question:  “The baptism of John — was it from heaven or from  men?” (Mark 11:30). The unspoken answer was,  “From heaven,” meaning it was endorsed by God.  John was a man sent from God (John 1:6), and as a  prophet of God (Luke 7:24,26), his message came from God. So did his baptism. 

John’s baptism – It involved believing/faith. The  apostle Paul declared, “John indeed baptized with a  baptism of repentance, saying to the people that they  should believe on Him who would come after him,  that is, on Christ Jesus” (Acts 19:4). At one point in  his ministry, John spoke about one who was coming  that was mightier than him (Mark 1:7). In a later  phase of his preaching, John identified Jesus as the  Lamb of God who takes away sin. John’s baptism  required faith: faith in the Christ Who was to come.  Baptism of “the Great Commission” also involves  believing (Mark 16:16), but it is faith in the fact that  Jesus already died for our sins and already rose  from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:1-4).

John’s baptism – It involved a confession. Those  who received John’s baptism confessed their sins (Mark 1:5). In contrast to that, those who receive  Great Commission baptism confess their faith in  Jesus, as the eunuch from Africa did (Acts 8:35-37;  Romans 10:9,10).

John’s baptism – It required repentance. As we  noted, “John indeed baptized with a baptism of  repentance . . .” (Acts 19:4). Repentance also is  mandatory for those who want to receive Great  Commission baptism (Acts 2:38).

John’s baptism – It had a purpose. “John came  baptizing in the wilderness and preaching a baptism  of repentance for the remission of sins” (Mark 1:4).  It was not just a baptism. It was not just a baptism of  repentance. It was a baptism of repentance for the  remission of sins. Now what gave us that idea? It is  a direct quote from the Bible, so I plan to believe it.

John’s baptism – John immersed Jesus (Mark  1:9), but our Lord did not receive the baptism of  John for the remission of sins. What is called  “John’s baptism” was for people who needed to  repent of their sins. Those folks confessed their sins.  Sinless Jesus had no sins to confess or forsake.  Again, John’s baptism was “for the remission of  sins” (Luke 3:3). The Christ was not subject to such  a baptism. He was baptized to fulfill all  righteousness (Matthew 3:15).

John’s baptism – It was not a permanent  arrangement. The baptism of the Great Commission is into the name of the Father, Son, and Spirit  (Matthew 28:19), and it is in force until the end of  the world/age. Neither of those things is said about  the baptism of John. Baptism under the new  covenant is into the Christ and His death (Romans  6:3). That is never said about John’s baptism. About  twenty-five years after John and Jesus died, a man  by the name of Apollos was preaching John’s  baptism as if it still were valid. Aquila and Priscilla  “explained to him the way of God more accurately”  (Acts 18:26). Apollos was preaching an outdated  baptism: John’s baptism evidently was not in force  after the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2).

John’s baptism was part of his God-given  mission to prepare the way for the Christ. Our  salvation is not through John and his baptism, but  via Jesus and our obedience to Him (Hebrews 5:9).

— An article written by Roger D. Campbell